6 Ways Chess Pro’s Think Differently

What makes a chess master different from a typical player? Everyone aspires to learn the master’s secrets and one day to become one. Chess players are always seeking for new ways to enhance their game. They concentrate on tactics, endgame mastery, and even more about chess openings, but they overlook the most crucial aspect of the game: THINKING. We’ll look at six ways chess masters think differently than the rest of the field in this post.

1. The 80/20 Rule is used by chess masters

The 80/20 rule is a crucial guideline to remember. It holds true in a variety of situations, including chess. It is well recognized that 20% of efforts provide 80% of the results. Chess experts know exactly what to focus on and how to train, but average chess players waste the majority of their time focusing on the wrong things in the wrong way.

As a result, individuals make much more progress in significantly less time. Across the board, the same idea applies. Regular players have no understanding what lines to study or calculate, but chess masters do. As a result, chess masters are more productive and able to focus their efforts on the most pressing issues.

2. Chess Grandmasters Are Upbeat

Being upbeat is an excellent quality to have, not just for training but in general. Positive attitude aids masters in more effectively training and absorbing material. It also aids in staying focused and performing at one’s best while under duress. Constantly worrying about the game’s outcome saps your energy. Staying calm and enthusiastic about the outcome helps you to focus on the important things.

3. Chess Grandmasters Aren’t Afraid to Stand Out

The regulations are usually followed by regular players. It’s an excellent tactic until you reach a certain level, which is likely to be between 1800 and 2000 elo. To advance ahead, you must begin to breach the rules. Chess masters frequently do this. They are aware of when to follow and when to defy the rules.

I’m not referring to erroneously moving chess pieces or castling when in check. The norms I’m referring to include things like “not bringing out the queen too early,” “not developing bishops before knights,” and “not sacrificing material when uncertain.” There are always exceptions to these kinds of rules, and only experience allows you to see them. Masters are excellent at identifying and applying exceptions, which greatly aids them in gaining the upper hand.

4. Chess Grandmasters Accept Full Responsibility for Any Results

Chess experts know better and take full responsibility for their failures, whereas average players frequently blame outside causes. Have you ever heard Garry Kasparov whine about losing because of a mistake or because his opponent was fortunate? It’s really unlikely. Instead, masters would accept loss and pinpoint the source of the problem. Losses are not considered embarrassing or unsatisfactory by masters, as they are by amateurs.

Strong players regard losses as a chance to grow. Learning the lessons and mastering the abilities is what chess is all about. You’ll be on your way to becoming a chess master in no time if you learn just one useful lesson from each loss!

5. Chess Masters Aren’t Afraid to Take Chances Chess is a game of risk

It’s impossible to win games without taking calculated risks. Chess experts understand the importance of taking measured risks. Regular players, on the other hand, are hesitant to take risks, such as surrendering material. They, ironically, lose games as a result of this. When you are down a piece and would lose if you don’t play energetically, it is sometimes more safer to take a calculated risk rather than continue to play strong defense.

It’s reasonable, because the risks of “sacing” a queen incorrectly outweigh the benefits of checkmating the opponent’s king. Experience will teach you when to take risks, but until then, you’ll have to learn by trial and error.

6. Chess Grandmasters Work Together

Another notable distinction between masters and typical chess players is this. Chess is rarely discussed among regular players. Please allow me to explain what I mean. There may be a few fundamental debates here and there, but nothing that leads to learning in general. Chess is usually played by amateurs alone (or with an especially dedicated coach). Master players work together on a variety of areas of the game.

They debate theoretical innovations, evaluate games, and engage in full-length sparring contests, among other things. Master players also devote a significant amount of time to training sessions that focus on certain aspects of the game. It’s quite useful, and it’s one of the things that distinguishes masters from the rest of the players, despite their 2200 elo. Chess experts have a lot to learn from one another. This is something that regular gamers should do more of!